ADVERTISEMENT

media bias front and center

1. She’s completely full of shit. President, John Kelly, Jeff Sessions and Stephen fücking Miller are all on record to the contrary.

2. FoxNews is a full on right wing propaganda network. That game is over. They have as much credibility as Breitbart.

Don’t think so! But you’re entitled to you VOX based opinion .
 
How Are Laws Made?
Laws begin as ideas. First, a representative sponsors a bill. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on. Again, a simple majority (51 of 100) passes the bill. Finally, a conference committee made of House and Senate members works out any differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval. The Government Printing Office prints the revised bill in a process called enrolling. The President has 10 days to sign or veto the enrolled bill.

https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process

It's weird that this says 51 when I see the 60 vote rule mentioned most places
Please look up Filibuster.... it's the process where a senate committee member can basically kill a bill by talking it to death. In order to break a filibuster you need 60 votes. Since the democrats do nothing but obstruct, this is not a viable option. Of course, the president has the "Nuclear" option which allows him to sign it into bill with a majority vote - but this is something considered as taboo by both democrats and republicans because of their idiocy.

I don't mean to be a jerk (at least too much) but your point above just proves my point about liberal obstructionists. They do nothing but block Trump initiatives and bad mouth anything he proposes. It's quite pathetic and is why I hate liberals.
 
And all of them entered illegally. So, not that it’s a good thing but maybe the legal process just might save lives lost as a result of human trafficking.
I'm all for setting up a better system. I think that everyone is.
 
Where? In the detention facilities? Have you ever thought maybe it's not a safe place for them and that's why they are being separated? FWIW, 90% of these kids are released to a family member inside the US. We are prosecuting adults, not children. If there's a better way, I'm all for it. Just not sure what it is.
worst argument ever.
 
Please look up Filibuster.... it's the process where a senate committee member can basically kill a bill by talking it to death. In order to break a filibuster you need 60 votes. Since the democrats do nothing but obstruct, this is not a viable option. Of course, the president has the "Nuclear" option which allows him to sign it into bill with a majority vote - but this is something considered as taboo by both democrats and republicans because of their idiocy.

I don't mean to be a jerk (at least too much) but your point above just proves my point about liberal obstructionists. They do nothing but block Trump initiatives and bad mouth anything he proposes. It's quite pathetic and is why I hate liberals.
Did you feel the same way for the four years that the Republicans obstructed Obama's presidency?
 
This is really very simple: Trump, in a terrible attempt at political hardball is using this to try and force the democrats to fund his stupid wall idea. Regardless of when the laws were written - this has always been considered a nuclear option and was not used by previous administrations. No matter what Trump is saying, this is all his doing and he could stop it today if he wanted to. But that wont get him his funding.

All you guys need to do is take off the blinders and realize that if this ever happened to ONE SINGLE American child in a foreign country, we'd invade their country. It is cruel and inhuman to use children as a political carrot. "Laws being enforced" is a completely baseless claim. A policeman can arrest someone for stealing by placing his hands in cuffs. Or he can slam his face into the pavement - kick him a few times, then place him in cuffs. Both are "enforcing the law" if you can't see the difference you are too far into the president's ass to realize a stupid policy when you see one.
It's happening in our OWN COUNTRY EVERY day. When a parent gets arrested for breaking a law the child gets separated from the parents. Why should it be different for someone who isn't even a citizen? And at least we can prove the children are at least really related to the parents in most cases.... I've heard many stories about kids and adults saying they are related and can't even answer simple questions about each other. Build the wall - and make them enter the country LEGALLY and we would all be better off. I'm all for LEGAL immigration.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BDB99
Did you feel the same way for the four years that the Republicans obstructed Obama's presidency?
It wasn't even CLOSE to the level being seen today... you can't get a single vote from the democrats/socialists. I think many people who have worked hard in this country are tired of seeing it turned into a socialist country. This is a capitalist country first and forever.

Plus, everyone wants to fix immigration - only the democrats refuse to even discuss ways to fix it. They would rather have MSNBC and CNN show pictures of children at the border to win votes. I found it sadly hilarious that the liberals showed a picture of children locked up in a fenced in jail only to find out it was taken under the Obama administration.

If you don't like the laws - CHANGE it. Trump is only asking to enforce the bills.
 
kids are safer being separated from their parents.
I mean, they might be. I haven't toured these facilities so I can't really say what they are like, but if they're anything like jails I don't think that's unreasonable at all. Plus the kids are being allowed to stay, since it's not their fault their parents chose to break the law. I assume they could go back to their home country if they wanted.
 
It wasn't even CLOSE to the level being seen today... you can't get a single vote from the democrats/socialists. I think many people who have worked hard in this country are tired of seeing it turned into a socialist country. This is a capitalist country first and forever.
how often did Republicans vote in favor of something Obama wanted?
 
how often did Republicans vote in favor of something Obama wanted?
I don't know - why don't you go look it up since you are so curious. I know it was nothing like it is today though. He can't even get all of his appointments approved through the senate.... longer than any president in history.

My wife is German and we went back to see her family a few months ago and she was literally crying as she looked at the shadow of the city she grew up in because of what Angela Merkel has done to Germany with their immigration policies. It was really shocking to hear stories straight from the family and friends about how the city has been destroyed and how crime has multiplied to new levels. I don't want to see this happen to our country - it's NOT THEIR COUNTRY.

Immigration is fine, but do it the right way.
 
I support building the wall and fixing the legal immigration system. Families should be able to come here to better their lives, but we have to know who's coming in and keep the criminals out. Is this a reasonable position to the left?
 
keeping families together? We agree

Not necessarily that, but immediate deportation as opposed to separating families? I'm on board with.

There really are no good options here but that's the least bad one. The next is separation. Allowing false claims of asylum or effectively open borders is a non-starter for me.
 
5 people died yesterday. All of them were immigrants.
So, why would you endanger your kids and or family to come into this country illegally with a bunch of smugglers who don't give a damn about you?
 
Please look up Filibuster.... it's the process where a senate committee member can basically kill a bill by talking it to death. In order to break a filibuster you need 60 votes. Since the democrats do nothing but obstruct, this is not a viable option. Of course, the president has the "Nuclear" option which allows him to sign it into bill with a majority vote - but this is something considered as taboo by both democrats and republicans because of their idiocy.

I don't mean to be a jerk (at least too much) but your point above just proves my point about liberal obstructionists. They do nothing but block Trump initiatives and bad mouth anything he proposes. It's quite pathetic and is why I hate liberals.

liberal obstuctionists? Ted Cruz read Green Eggs and Ham on the Seante floor, but it's just the dems who obstruct.

Bottom line, Trump's trading kids' welfare for a wall, that was supposed to be paid for already. An abomination for this Country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom_99
liberal obstuctionists? Ted Cruz read Green Eggs and Ham on the Seante floor, but it's just the dems who obstruct.

Bottom line, Trump's trading kids' welfare for a wall, that was supposed to be paid for already. An abomination for this Country.
What was Obama’s trading kids welfare for when he was putting them in cages and separating them from their parents? It was happening but there wasn’t a concerted effort by the Democrats and media to show feigned outrage for a political purpose. This problem needs to be fixed in the country these people are fleeing from and it starts with us building a wall to control our borders. We aren’t asking these kids to invade our country their parents are. We are being forced to build a wall or deal with them once they are here.
 
What was Obama’s trading kids welfare for when he was putting them in cages and separating them from their parents? It was happening but there wasn’t a concerted effort by the Democrats and media to show feigned outrage for a political purpose. This problem needs to be fixed in the country these people are fleeing from and it starts with us building a wall to control our borders. We aren’t asking these kids to invade our country their parents are. We are being forced to build a wall or deal with them once they are here.
The Obama detentions were for unaccompanied kids that crossed the border. That’s a verified and documented fact. Quite a difference from breaking up families as leverage for a useless fücking wall. Besides that, “whataboutism” is stupid reasoning. Nothing that happened in the past justifies or excuses what is happenening now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom_99
The Obama detentions were for unaccompanied kids that crossed the border. That’s a verified and documented fact. Quite a difference from breaking up families as leverage for a useless fücking wall. Besides that, “whataboutism” is stupid reasoning. Nothing that happened in the past justifies or excuses what is happenening now.
The point is that it’s been happening and just now it’s a horror that Trump is completely responsible for. The outrage is fake. This started when these kids started showing up unaccompanied or otherwise. They caused the problem and only now media is outraged? Please
 
liberal obstuctionists? Ted Cruz read Green Eggs and Ham on the Seante floor, but it's just the dems who obstruct.

Bottom line, Trump's trading kids' welfare for a wall, that was supposed to be paid for already. An abomination for this Country.

Ted Cruz had a legit reason to filibuster over the ridiculous spending increases in the continuing resolution at the time.

The only other real filibuster during the Obama Administration that I can recall was Rand Paul protesting the Patriot Act- specifically drone strikes on US citizens who hadn't been convicted of a crime and the warrantless surveillance of American citizens.

It was disingenuously termed a "filibuster" but merely refusing to vote for cloture in the Senate is not a filibuster. IIRC, 60 votes are required in the Senate to invoke cloture and end debate on a matter which can then be passed on a simple majority. Since the Reps didn't have a majority to stop Obama's harmful policies they had to refuse to invoke cloture. Of course, when Obama did have 60 votes in the Senate he chose to ram through ObamaCare which was ultimately the largest tax increase in history and is a massive piece of shit and he chose to ram through the Stimulus Bill which was nothing more than a payoff to his donors and did nothing to improve the economy but rather was instrumental in the weakest recovery in history.
 
The Obama detentions were for unaccompanied kids that crossed the border. That’s a verified and documented fact. Quite a difference from breaking up families as leverage for a useless fücking wall. Besides that, “whataboutism” is stupid reasoning. Nothing that happened in the past justifies or excuses what is happenening now.

Negative- they were separated at the border as well. Not just unaccompanied minors.

And if you weren't ranting about Obama doing it a few years ago then you have no moral standing to do so now simply because you don't like Trump.

While not a good thing to separate families, ultimately these families made a choice and that choice has consequences.
 
I don't know - why don't you go look it up since you are so curious. I know it was nothing like it is today though. He can't even get all of his appointments approved through the senate.... longer than any president in history.

My wife is German and we went back to see her family a few months ago and she was literally crying as she looked at the shadow of the city she grew up in because of what Angela Merkel has done to Germany with their immigration policies. It was really shocking to hear stories straight from the family and friends about how the city has been destroyed and how crime has multiplied to new levels. I don't want to see this happen to our country - it's NOT THEIR COUNTRY.

Immigration is fine, but do it the right way.
Kind of hard to believe that this obstruction is worse since you are unable to provide anything to back that up.
 
You use this quote as if you think conservatives actually care about Jesus or his teachings.

Conservatives do.
Don’t confuse some of these wingers on here with Conservatives.

One is not like the other.
 
My question here is what is the purpose of separating the children from the parents. Not just the argument of "it's the law" because SS soldiers were just following the law when escorting children to gas chambers.

The always effective "you're a nazi" counter argument. Love it. Now we just need someone (LSA) to say we are only doing this because we hate brown people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdogdfw
  • Like
Reactions: darterbury
What the media is missing is that a majority of these kids are not showing up with their parent but some handler that works for coyote organization.
 
I've already posted two sources on this thread which show Snopes is incorrect. See this post: https://tamu.forums.rivals.com/threads/media-bias-front-and-center.88286/page-3#post-1790944

And neither are remotely conservative sites. One is the UK paper, the Guardian. And the other is actually a moderately left-leaning think tank.
Regardless, you're just using "whataboutism" and it has no real bearing on what is happening. What Trump is doing is punitive and far beyond anything done by a previous administration.

I fully support deporting illegals that are caught at the border. However, if they have children with them, they should be kept together through the process. Asylum seekers deserve to be treated w/ dignity and respect and are a completely separate matter.

This country used to be the standard bearer that stood above other countries in how we dealt w/ those that have been wronged at home and are seeking refuge. We've lost that moral high ground in a matter of weeks.
 
I've already posted two sources on this thread which show Snopes is incorrect. See this post: https://tamu.forums.rivals.com/threads/media-bias-front-and-center.88286/page-3#post-1790944

And neither are remotely conservative sites. One is the UK paper, the Guardian. And the other is actually a moderately left-leaning think tank.
the article relates to deportation of an established family member. That's still occuring and is separate from immediate family separations.
 
People getting killed somewhere has what to exactly with following the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment?
If you are interested in cruel and unusual punishment maybe you should direct your comments to the parents and family who endangered their children by knowingly entering a foreign country illegally. They are safer where they are now than when they were traveling with smugglers across the border.
 
If you are interested in cruel and unusual punishment maybe you should direct your comments to the parents and family who endangered their children by knowingly entering a foreign country illegally. They are safer where they are now than when they were traveling with smugglers across the border.
You really don't have a single clue what you're talking about. If you did, you'd know that your statement above is quite literally, the opposite of the truth.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT