ADVERTISEMENT

media bias front and center

If American parents commit a crime, what happens to their children? They are separated from the parents and sent to foster care or somehow put in the system. Why should it be different for those who cross our borders illegally? This is an emotional issue stimulated by the MSM to get Trump. As long as we are treating those children properly and humanely until they are reunited for deportation, I'm OK with it.
People keep saying this, but the fact is that this is not stereotypical illegal immigration. It is people seeking asylum. Removing these young children from their parents is not humane treatment.
 
Where did I say that we should let everyone in? I merely stated that coming to the border and requesting asylum was not illegal. Are you disagreeing with that fact?
Not at all. And I don't agree with separating parents from young children. But it seems like a lot of this could be avoided if the process started in countries of origin as opposed to coming across the border with certain expectations.

Feel free to answer my other questions if you like. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dturfmeister
https://www.indystar.com/story/news...es-together-act-immigration-reform/709409002/

The Indiana Democrat tweeted that while he does think those who break the country's immigration laws need to be held accountable, he does not support the policy that allows the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to take immigrant children away from parents.

This doesn't sound like open borders to me...


Then change the law! You know, first you ought to ask how many (none) are being detained from lawful entry. Then of those being detained how many actually entered WITH their parents OR have documented relatives that are LEGALLY here.

Then let’s talk!
 
Your argument is two wrongs make a right?

You know this wrong. Stop being blind to it because of party loyalty.

That is not my argument, my argument is selective outrage is silly. Take the emotion out of it and lets reason together; what is the solution to this problem?

It has nothing to do with party loyalty. I agreed with Bill Clinton and barbara jordan when they said we need to secure the border.

Do criminals usually get to take their children to prison with them? Why are criminal illegal aliens any different? Regardless of moral outrage, the fix to all of this is border security and immigration reform. yes or no?
 
Then change the law! You know, first you ought to ask how many (none) are being detained from lawful entry. Then of those being detained how many actually entered WITH their parents OR have documented relatives that are LEGALLY here.

Then let’s talk!
They can't change the law because none of the Republicans in the Senate are interested in changing the law. We've already been over how asylum is different from illegal immigration, keep up.
 
If American parents commit a crime, what happens to their children? They are separated from the parents and sent to foster care or somehow put in the system. Why should it be different for those who cross our borders illegally? This is an emotional issue stimulated by the MSM to get Trump. As long as we are treating those children properly and humanely until they are reunited for deportation, I'm OK with it.
They go to the next of kin and we do what we can to keep their lives as stable as possible. Why do some of you keep posting that they go to foster care, as if it's fact?
 
Last edited:
Then change the law! You know, first you ought to ask how many (none) are being detained from lawful entry. Then of those being detained how many actually entered WITH their parents OR have documented relatives that are LEGALLY here.

Then let’s talk!
let's not
 
If you want to see how open borders affects a state look at Germany. Merkel May soon be out of a job. I’m not in favor of that wall but all the Dems have to do to get Trump doing something even his own party doesn’t like is fund that wall. It’s called compromise. And if you break the law you go to jail, not you and your kids, you. What laws would you rather we not enforce. Obama, Bush and Clinton each had 8 years to fix immigration and they punted.
 
That’s irrelevant. Regardless of what has happened before, the government is prohibited from acting in this manner.

Not to mention that it’s just plain wrong to treat people this way. We are supposed to be better than this.
Tell that to the people who got killed in Big Wells yesterday.
 
What is Mexico's policy at its southern border? Why don't folks try to get asylum in Mexico?

Why aren't people going to the U.S. embassy in their home countries and requesting asylum?

I can't answer as to why they don't attempt to get asylum in Mexico. Maybe they just assume the US would be a better country to live in.

I'm not sure these people are generally well educated enough to know all of the various outlets at their disposal, so they probably just assume that they can work those things out when they get to a safer country. I would also assume that the ability for them to use the US embassy in their country would be somewhat limited if they actually need asylum.
 
Weird that you got thst from what I said, sicko

Yeah, in fact that’s exactly what I took from it! There’s a law and there’s a process. Follow both, i’m good. Break either, then you got problems. That is not a sick position.
 
If you want to see how open borders affects a state look at Germany. Merkel May soon be out of a job. I’m not in favor of that wall but all the Dems have to do to get Trump doing something even his own party doesn’t like is fund that wall. It’s called compromise. And if you break the law you go to jail, not you and your kids, you. What laws would you rather we not enforce. Obama, Bush and Clinton each had 8 years to fix immigration and they punted.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ion-antisemitism-horst-seehofer-a8343226.html

oops, try again
 
People keep saying this, but the fact is that this is not stereotypical illegal immigration. It is people seeking asylum. Removing these young children from their parents is not humane treatment.
What is it that you think should be done with them?
 
They can't change the law because none of the Republicans in the Senate are interested in changing the law. We've already been over how asylum is different from illegal immigration, keep up.
And, no one is being separated for proper filing for asylum at a port of entry!
 
I don't think that either side knows what the word "negotiate" means at this point. And it's kind of difficult to negotiate when the leadership on the right is so far right that even the moderate Democrats are having difficulty negotiating.

That goes both ways. You apparently are a Democrat (although I don't know) and believe that there are "moderate" Democrats. I don't believe moderation exists in either political party at this juncture. Republicans would say the same about the Democrats leadership. There is no negotiating any issue that is "politicized."

I think all of us agree that separating parents and kids is a bad idea (although the moral outrage shown by some is overblown since kids are separated from their parents for all kinds of reasons--see CPS cases). However, I am also a believer in personal responsibility. These Parents deserve blame in this scenario (which some are unwilling to either admit or come to grips with). If this is a problem, then we need to change the law. Selective enforcement of laws is NEVER a good idea.

Both parties have been in complete control of the country when these laws were on the books. Both are responsible. Just because this flared up now does not make one party (or class of people) demons and subject to personal attacks. The Democrats felt that using their capital to enact Obamacare was more important than changing immigration laws (which EVERYONE knew was an issue even then). Republicans have made similar decisions. The moral outrage and finger pointing is ludicrous, and to me is nothing more than political grandstanding.

No one wants to listen when you call someone an immoral pig and only want to blame them instead of working with them.
 
"There is no one process. Judging from the mothers and fathers I’ve spoken to and those my staff has spoken to, there are several different processes. Sometimes they will tell the parent, “We’re taking your child away.” And when the parent asks, “When will we get them back?” they say, “We can’t tell you that.” Sometimes the officers will say, “because you’re going to be prosecuted” or “because you’re not welcome in this country” or “because we’re separating them,” without giving them a clear justification. In other cases, we see no communication that the parent knows that their child is to be taken away. Instead, the officers say, “I’m going to take your child to get bathed.” That’s one we see again and again. “Your child needs to come with me for a bath.” The child goes off, and in a half an hour, twenty minutes, the parent inquires, “Where is my five-year-old?” “Where’s my seven-year-old?” “This is a long bath.” And they say, “You won’t be seeing your child again.” Sometimes mothers—I was talking to one mother, and she said, “Don’t take my child away,” and the child started screaming and vomiting and crying hysterically, and she asked the officers, “Can I at least have five minutes to console her?” They said no.

In another case, the father said, “Can I comfort my child? Can I hold him for a few minutes?” The officer said, “You must let them go, and if you don’t let them go, I will write you up for an altercation, which will mean that you are the one that had the additional charges charged against you.” So, threats. So the father just let the child go. So it’s a lot of variations. But sometimes deceit and sometimes direct, just “I’m taking your child away.”

Parents are not getting any information on what their rights are to communicate to get their child before they are deported, what reunification may look like. We spoke to nine parents on this Monday, which was the 11th, and these were adults in detention centers outside of Houston. They had been separated from their child between May 23 and May 25, and as of June 11, not one of them had been able to talk to their child or knew a phone number that functioned from the detention center director. None of them had direct information from immigration on where their child was located. The one number they were given by some government official from the Department of Homeland Security was a 1-800 number. But from the phones inside the detention center, they can’t make those calls.

We know there are more parents who are being deported without their child, without any process or information on how to get their child back."

My question here is what is the purpose of separating the children from the parents. Not just the argument of "it's the law" because SS soldiers were just following the law when escorting children to gas chambers.

If anyone here thinks that any US state or federal government can take care of children or do what is in their best interest I would say. go be a foster parent. You'll get an entirely new perspective on how well we handle children. I am a foster parent and speak from experience.

Finally, let's all take a hard look in the mirror about how this is one of a myriad of issues that overlaps and our cognitive dissonance in how we interpret rights of children in various situations.
 
Tell that to the people who got killed in Big Wells yesterday.
People getting killed somewhere has what to exactly with following the constitutional prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment?
 
My question here is what is the purpose of separating the children from the parents. Not just the argument of "it's the law" because SS soldiers were just following the law when escorting children to gas chambers.

If anyone here thinks that any US state or federal government can take care of children or do what is in their best interest I would say. go be a foster parent. You'll get an entirely new perspective on how well we handle children. I am a foster parent and speak from experience.

Finally, let's all take a hard look in the mirror about how this is one of a myriad of issues that overlaps and our cognitive dissonance in how we interpret rights of children in various situations.

There was no law on the books which either authorized or allowed extermination of children by the NAZI's. This was illegal orders by the SS and acceptance by the public that allowed this to go on.
 
So ... are you claiming the head of DHS has been misquoted or is not telling the truth? Or is your specific media bias directed at Fox News?
Considering the fact that this administration has been saying up to 5 different things regarding this policy, I think he's saying she's not telling the full truth. Fox News is garbage for news, though.
 
I can't answer as to why they don't attempt to get asylum in Mexico. Maybe they just assume the US would be a better country to live in.

I'm not sure these people are generally well educated enough to know all of the various outlets at their disposal, so they probably just assume that they can work those things out when they get to a safer country. I would also assume that the ability for them to use the US embassy in their country would be somewhat limited if they actually need asylum.
I hear you. Appreciate the response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mwgreen12
So ... are you claiming the head of DHS has been misquoted or is not telling the truth? Or is your specific media bias directed at Fox News?
1. She’s completely full of shit. President, John Kelly, Jeff Sessions and Stephen fücking Miller are all on record to the contrary.

2. FoxNews is a full on right wing propaganda network. That game is over. They have as much credibility as Breitbart.
 
Considering the fact that this administration has been saying up to 5 different things regarding this policy, I think he's saying she's not telling the full truth. Fox News is garbage for news, though.
Well, you thinking it is not exactly proof. I’ll wait for a real example if you don’t mind.
 
I think they should remain with their families
Where? In the detention facilities? Have you ever thought maybe it's not a safe place for them and that's why they are being separated? FWIW, 90% of these kids are released to a family member inside the US. We are prosecuting adults, not children. If there's a better way, I'm all for it. Just not sure what it is.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT