ADVERTISEMENT

For the Ags taking ivermectin as a Covid preventative:

I'm not a doctor, but understood this drug was for cows and horses. The only people taking it are jackasses. Get vaccinated. Follow science, not conspiracy theories.
You are not a doctor, so quit trying to tell people what to do with their body, jackass. I took Ivermectin prescribed to me by a doctor and it cured me. So did my brother and many friends. Quit trying to speak about something you know nothing about.
 
You are not a doctor, so quit trying to tell people what to do with their body, jackass. I took Ivermectin prescribed to me by a doctor and it cured me. So did my brother and many friends. Quit trying to speak about something you know nothing about.
How did you get it prescribed by a doctor?
 
This is the the way.



Also, they will only pay the vaccinated while out of work with COVID.

Effective Sept 30, in compliance with state and local laws, COVID pay protection will only be provided to fully vaccinated individuals who are experiencing a breakthrough infection.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MeatWalletMassacre
Yes, discrimination is the new "way".
Fat people should also pay a surcharge.
History of cancer in your family, Surcharge!

History of cancer is not a "personal choice". Being fat could be justified.
 
How did you get it prescribed by a doctor?
I used the Front Line Doctors because I could do it all online (after I was diagnosed with Covid from CVS who told me to go home and wait to get so bad I had to go to the hospital and offered zero options for medications). https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/

There are also several doctors in the McKinney area that I could have used as well.
 
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.
 
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.
Choices matter, but the vax doesn't change any of this.
ANYONE can get and transmit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDB99 and tdogdfw
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.

We’ve had 4-5 already at our school. None of the kids have shown any symptoms but they’re quarantined out of an abundance of caution. There’s going to be cases, even with the vaccine, so I’m not entirely sure what point you’re trying to make here. With all due respect of course…I have 3 kids myself.
 
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.

And to be fair, I’m a proponent of the vaccine and would have loved for everyone to get it and it work like the CDC and our political leaders said it would. Unfortunately, that’s not the case so while I still believe it’s a good idea to get the shot, you know as well as I do that it’s not going to stop this. We can keep playing this game as long as we want but this shit is here to stay.
 
And to be fair, I’m a proponent of the vaccine and would have loved for everyone to get it and it work like the CDC and our political leaders said it would. Unfortunately, that’s not the case so while I still believe it’s a good idea to get the shot, you know as well as I do that it’s not going to stop this. We can keep playing this game as long as we want but this shit is here to stay.
If you keep talking sane, we won't have anything to B**ch about for 11 days....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lukeag and cmergele
They're certainly part of the answer by reducing hospitalizations and deaths, but they could actually be aiding in transmission.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDB99
They're certainly part of the answer by reducing hospitalizations and deaths, but they could actually be aiding in transmission.
Yet, there are still plenty of vaccinated deaths and deaths and injuries from the vax and everyone is skewing the numbers, so who knows what the real stats are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BDB99
We’ve had 4-5 already at our school. None of the kids have shown any symptoms but they’re quarantined out of an abundance of caution. There’s going to be cases, even with the vaccine, so I’m not entirely sure what point you’re trying to make here. With all due respect of course…I have 3 kids myself.

School in our ISD started August 10. No mask mandate, you do what you feel is best. 816 active cases out of 46,000+ students at 45 total schools.

13 total cases among students and 9 current active out of 776 on-campus at my younger one's elementary. That's 1.16% active cases. There was a kid in his class test positive and per the email, last in class on the 19th. Nothing since and no symptoms with my kid or at least 3 other kids in the same class who are on his baseball team.

11 total cases among students and 9 current active out of 1748 students at my oldests middle school (6-8th grade). That's 0.51%.

You do you (generically and not directed to @sigeast02) but why should I worry?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agswag12
According to two studies, they are reducing transmission (not yet peer reviewed). We should all be wearing masks indoors and schools and offices should be working to increase ventilation, though:
https://www.businessinsider.com/cov...-vaccinated-people-clear-virus-quicker-2021-8
I was thinking more along the lines of vaccinated people not realizing they are sick, but that article also says 85% are symptomatic so I’m not sure. The WSJ article suggested covid infection lives mostly in the mucous membranes of vaccinated, so the symptoms may more commonly be mistaken for allergies or something other than covid.
 
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.

Was the positive case a result of an unvaccinated parent who was not wearing a mask and taking Ivermectin and chasing it with Falstaff sending their unmasked kid to school and being in the same room as your son?

Just wanting more details of how my choices are affecting others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slgilmore
Find the right doctor. I just got it prescribed 10 minutes ago. FWIW this doctors office has zero vaxxed employees and no one wears masks. They’ve all been on ivermectin protocol since Feb and deal with 30-40 positive cases a week. Zero Covid among their staff. I have no proof but that’s what they said. Obviously that’s not proof it works, but it sounds promising.
 
Find the right doctor. I just got it prescribed 10 minutes ago. FWIW this doctors office has zero vaxxed employees and no one wears masks. They’ve all been on ivermectin protocol since Feb and deal with 30-40 positive cases a week. Zero Covid among their staff. I have no proof but that’s what they said. Obviously that’s not proof it works, but it sounds promising.

Anecdotal Evidence.

Inadmissible!!!!
 
For anyone who has followed along, I have a 4 year old who is a medium at risk case. He is at a public school pre-K in our neighborhood. Made it 2 full days and got the call today that there is a positive case in his class. 2 Fing days.

Your choices affect others. So far just a quarantine.
And people who have been vaccinated are also getting it... and passing it on to others.
 
Choices matter, but the vax doesn't change any of this.
ANYONE can get and transmit.
Not here for all this dumb shit today. I know, I know India solved it and the Illuminati are hiding it and Isreal proves that you are right bc the conversative intercepter times has four articles and horses are people too. We have heard all the TOTALLY normal reasoning from this thread
 
This was published over a year ago which is a long time in Covid years. For what it's worth. From the Royal Irish Academy interview with Dr. Campbell.

Does ivermectin kill the COVID-19 virus?​

24 April 2020
Professor William Cecil Campbell is a distinguished parasitologist and one of the more outstanding living scientists born and educated in Ireland. He was Senior Director of Parasitology and Director for Assay Research and Development at the Merck Institute for Therapeutic Research, New Jersey, USA, where he worked from 1957 to1990. He and his team were responsible for the discovery and development of at least six pharmaceutics, including ivermectin, which have had a huge and helpful influence on human and animal health. In 2015 he was awarded the Nobel prize in Physiology or Medicine with Professor Satoshi Omura ‘for their discoveries concerning a novel therapy against infections caused by roundworm parasites’. He was elected an honorary member of the Royal Irish Academy in 2016. We have asked Professor Campbell to share his thoughts on the effects that ivermectin may have on the Covid-19 virus and below is his response.
It has been reported* that the antiparasitic drug ivermectin kills the Covid-19 virus (SARS CoV-2), and I have been asked repeatedly for my reaction to the report. Though destitute of expertise in virology, I will set down some thoughts on the subject, intended for a general reader. Perspective can be boring when prospects are exciting – but perspective is needed!
  1. Evidence of the lethal effect of ivermectin on the SARS CoV-2, virus has rightly been called to public attention. The report is, in itself, of great importance. “On the other hand,” the lethal effect was seen ‘in vitro’ (meaning in glass or plastic containers); and that is a long way from demonstrating such an effect in animals (in vivo tests).
  2. In this study the in vitro tests were not done by simply exposing the virus to the drug in glass or plastic containers, but rather by exposing the virus in living mammalian cells grown in such containers. That is a much higher level of in vitro test. It is a step closer to the situation in an animal body, and that makes the evidence somewhat more encouraging with respect to potential practical use of ivermectin as an antiviral agent. “On the other hand,” the concentration of drug needed to kill the virus was many times higher than the concentration of ivermectin found in the blood of people in the normal use of ivermectin to control parasitic disease.
  3. The fact that ivermectin has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in humans has been highlighted. If future studies were to provide evidence of ivermectin anti-viral efficacy in animals, the drug’s current approval by the FDA would be enormously helpful in the conduct of clinical trials, and would thus facilitate further development toward clinical use. “On the other hand,” it has been approved for use against parasites, not against viruses; and awareness of ivermectin’s prior approval for a different use carries the risk of unduly raising hopeful expectations in this matter, with attendant risk of hasty and ill-considered action.
  4. In view of the drug concentration differential just mentioned, the probability of ivermectin being used safely to kill the virus in people must be considered low. “On the other hand,” there is, as the authors of the report point out, the possibility that a safe dosage of ivermectin might reduce the rate of viral replication in the mammalian body, or affect the virus in other ways that might be revealed by further research. That is a more positive note on which to end.

W. C. Campbell. 9 April 2020.

 
Here are some updated numbers from my hospital and a couple others I can find

I can’t get the Sarasota memorial graph to post but there numbers are :
230 covid patients hospitalized: 25 vaccinated 205 unvaccinated
Of the 230: 51 in the ICU Three vaccinated, 48 unvaccinated
Of the 51 in ICU: 34 are ventilated, 1 vaccinated, 33 unvaccinated
Dashboard-Graphic-COVID-cases-Aug-25-2021-FB.jpg


Hospitalizations+20210823_a700a9e1-b0db-4a24-a7e3-444b8813713a-prv.jpg
 
Disingenuous while true? Lol
I can’t help you guys with critical thinking. It’s very obvious from this thread you will shout down experts and find an internet expert that has been discredited to somehow make you feel safe in your warm blanket of stupidity
 
Here are some updated numbers from my hospital and a couple others I can find

I can’t get the Sarasota memorial graph to post but there numbers are :
230 covid patients hospitalized: 25 vaccinated 205 unvaccinated
Of the 230: 51 in the ICU Three vaccinated, 48 unvaccinated
Of the 51 in ICU: 34 are ventilated, 1 vaccinated, 33 unvaccinated
Dashboard-Graphic-COVID-cases-Aug-25-2021-FB.jpg


Hospitalizations+20210823_a700a9e1-b0db-4a24-a7e3-444b8813713a-prv.jpg
Seems about the same as my neighbor working in the Med center here in Houston
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT