Go deeper into your histoire. Slavery has been around since the origins of man. You express your limited thinking every time you open your mouth
anyone heard the term "white adjacent"?
- Thread starter Rooster77
- Start date
"If you’re a convicted felon, you should never lose your right to vote, because your past shouldn’t preclude you from participating in a Democratic society."
Yes it should. Convicted of heinous behavior disqualifies you from orderly society
Last edited:
The appeals to “you’re angry” are just tool #1 in the liberal kit: ad hominem attacks. They are beyond logic so they immediately go to the worst rhetorical devices possible ASAP.
That's good stuff Samuel. I like your use of 'ad hominem'. Not many of us, including me, would have considered that language. Where's cheeky to explain to me?
Oh come on. You went to Catholic school, right? It’s Latin. Means “attack the man.”
The girl I should have married was named Lafleur and stole the communion wine from the church which housed the school from the time she was 7. I’m not a Cajun, but I know the culture.
Okay trump supporter. You know Trump who directly placed people with white nationalist ties to posts in DC and who directly called white nationalists and Jan6 insurrectionists as nice people who he loves.
And very closely tied to the USA, as an integral part of its conception. Can you acknowledge that? Are you okay?
Every post you send makes you sound like a miserable and hateful small man. You’re an insufferable human. And that’s just you and I’m smart enough to know you don’t represent an entire political party, even though you can’t make that distinction about me.
For example I love all kids that deserve love. You’re a dumbass who has to put words in my mouth because you don’t have a real reply.
I have not said anything that isn’t a fact. I don’t care if you can’t process it or understand it. I don’t expect much from you based on your inability to converse in a way that’s on topic or logical.
You’re a talking head parrot who cannot derive an original thought and you’re obsessed with me.
Get a grip and figure it out dude.
Yet your use of the term “negro” to describe the altercation of Will Smith and Chris Rock was very comfortable to you. Hmmm. I’m shocked over here.
But you had 4 years of Trump where this rhetoric was normalized. And now that Biden beat his ass you’re mad that it’s back to where it’s was before trump. That’s why people who think like you are running for political positions so that people like you don’t lose the little bit of power you/they think they have.
Last edited:
Ad Hominem
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.Examples: Schneider, Cheeky
I often use the term 'negro' to be intellectually honest. But . . . quote me where I used the term anywhere on AggieYell. . . . Oh, excuse me. There was that one time when I said a very large Alabama negro hurt little colt mccoy in the NC. Otherwise . . . what occurs between two entitled negroes is of little interest to me
Last edited:
I'm stuck sadly between Acadian Catholic on one side de ma famille and recovering Baptist sur l'autre côté
Your schtick is far beyond old. The “holier and wiser than thou” routine is pure bullshit. If the Democratic Party told you the sky was green and the grass was blue, you’d buy it just like now they tell you men are women, women are men, anything they sell, you buy.
Prove me wrong. Dispute one piece of wokeness. Gender identity as a matter of choice? Socialist economics? Racism as the basis for American society as a whole? Abortion on demand? Name one idea they’ve spoon fed you you don’t advocate at every turn. One point of disagreement with Democratic orthodoxy.
Well, as for your suggestions about my life, you may go outside and play hide and go fück yourself. I don’t take orders from strangers. Especially those who never met a marching order from Nancy Pelosi or Bernie Sanders he didn’t try to advocate at every possible opportunity.
Biden beat his ass. You're not keeping up with the hunter biden saga are you? If you were, you'd realize the idiocy in your statement
Trump beat his own ass by being an asshole. Exactly the same way Hillary Clinton did in 2016 by shitting on anyone who wasn’t slightly to the left of Chairman Mao. The Democrats could have run a dead monkey (Biden was and is damn close to that) and won because Trump is too stupid to be presidential. Politics is first and foremost a beauty pageant. And Trump managed to piss off a lot of the judges, and not “the Elites.” He was unnecessarily rude, thin-skinned, responded to things he should have ignored and then took idiot Fauci’s idea for lockdowns, imported from the People’s Democratic Republic of China and ran with it. Locking down healthy people had never happened in the history of disease in the United States, but Trump allowed the contagion of fear to spread, rather than saying. “We’re not communist China.”
He lost all credibility with me when that happened.
I said I wasn’t angry, not someone else was.
But you keep doing you, which is generally stupid, utterly ignorant and angry AF.
You never just respond to what I say. You make up shit and assign me to whatever you imagine what I am. You’re truly not worth a reply.
Ad Hominem
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone's argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument. The fallacious attack can also be direct to membership in a group or institution.Examples: SamuelS99
Well, keep letting your blessed party show whatever it wants up your ass as truth and keep being a troll. You can’t think for yourself and disagree with even one point of what they’re pushing down your throat.
I did respond to what you said, asshole.
Do you or do you not agree with the Democratic orthodoxy that felons should be allowed to vote as soon as they’re out of custody?
You’ve never disagreed with any stupidity those cocksuckers have ever come up with. Never once. If you had been around for Vietnam, you’d have been “all the way with LBJ.”
but. Slavery is the basic fact of American life and white kids’ opportunities in life should be curtailed to allow the descendants of former slaves better access to the best of, well, anything they want.
Ergo. Do not punish felons for what they did in this life. Once they’ve paid their dues, they’re clear to vote Democrat for the rest of their lives and even after.
But kids whose great-great-great-great grandparents had a 1 in 20 chance of being slaveholders need to pay the price for our great national sin.
Only democrats commit felonies? I was unaware of that.
I do remember reading history books with the chants "no taxation without representation except for convicted felons who have served their time and been released back into society!" It was so catchy it's almost impossible to forget.
What’s funny is I’ve never discussed any party with you or anyone. I’ve never told you what I support or what I don’t.
Yet you’re convinced you know where I stand on every topic and you paint me with a broad brush. And then you cry when I call you an idiot.
More like a gathering of like minded folks who wanted to prevent the elected president from becoming president?
In February you defined insurrection as trying to overthrow a government.
Lockdowns...
This guy..wank I don’t recognize him as one of th usual gang of idiots. Is he a new troll?
tamu.forums.rivals.com
There was no attempt to overthrow the government.
why does the podcast matter? I asked if anyone else has heard of the term as I have not hear it before. my motives are just that - is this term and application common now that liberals define what is acceptable and what is not?
and i did look it up and here is a reference that provides one angle on white adjacent
www.capecharlesmirror.com
New Word: White Adjacent – CAPE CHARLES MIRROR
www.capecharlesmirror.com
Slavery is still playing a role in other parts of the world, but it's not Caucasian owners, so why do we just focus on what ended 150 years ago?
Wow, the deflection and solid use of party line talking points is amazing...
Because if they can't argue the message, they will diminish the reputation of the message bearer.
You don't think people trying to prevent the certification of the election in some misguided hope of preventing the transition of power to the elected president was an attempt to overthrow the government?In February you defined insurrection as trying to overthrow a government.
Lockdowns...
This guy..wank I don’t recognize him as one of th usual gang of idiots. Is he a new troll?
There was no attempt to overthrow the government.
You should watch four hours at the capitol. Unlike the professor and Mary Anne, they were not on a four hour tour.
Last edited:
If you legitimately believe that some out of shape, unarmed, middle+ aged people leaving a pep rally, allowed to walk into the Capitol, were there to overthrow the strongest government in history of the world, you’re too stupid to be reading main stream propaganda.
This is precisely why it’s so dangerous.
If you believe everyone was allowed to walk in you have your head so far in the sand it’s disturbing.
We are talking about your assertion that these people were there to overthrow the government of the United States of America.
not how many got in by which way.
You said they were allowed to walk in. That’s a really ignorant statement.
There was a whole host of morons and idiots there that day. Some gawkers who married their sisters and were too stupid to know what they were doing, some who wanted to murder Pence so as to prevent Biden from becoming president. So a little of this, a little of that.
