Ginsburg
- Thread starter 2th_doc
- Start date
The left seems to be handling this fairly well.
Just kidding:
www.foxnews.com
"Let this moment radicalize you," Ocasio-Cortez said late Friday in a social media video.
"If Mitch McConnell is not going to honor RBG's final wish, we will,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
Just kidding:
AOC says Ginsburg's death should 'radicalize' Dems: 'I need you to be ready' | Fox News
'We need to focus on voting for Joe Biden. 'I don't care if you like him or not,' AOC says
"Let this moment radicalize you," Ocasio-Cortez said late Friday in a social media video.
"If Mitch McConnell is not going to honor RBG's final wish, we will,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
So democrats believe in using violence to get their way. They have become the party of violence and tyranny.
The way they handled impeachment and ramrodded it through was pathetic. The Republican minority couldn’t do anything about it. Guess what, Republicans have the majority in the Senate, so they need to quit whining about fair play and hypocrisy. Karma is a bitch sometimes. This is Denocracy at its finest. End of story.
The party has been taken over by radicalsThe left seems to be handling this fairly well.
Just kidding:
AOC says Ginsburg's death should 'radicalize' Dems: 'I need you to be ready' | Fox News
'We need to focus on voting for Joe Biden. 'I don't care if you like him or not,' AOC says
"Let this moment radicalize you," Ocasio-Cortez said late Friday in a social media video.
"If Mitch McConnell is not going to honor RBG's final wish, we will,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
Y’all are going to be shocked to hear this, but twitter isn’t censoring these tweets.
Years of identity politics and fear mongering have turn the left into raving lunatics that either get what they want or they will throw a gigantic temper tantrum until they do.
Moderate dems need to understand that their Party has left them.
Thoroughly enjoying the melt down from the left on this. It’s going to showcase just how radical the democrat party is thereby helping Trump win. RBG seemed like a pretty neat lady although our politics weren’t remotely close. Her name and reputation will be sullied if those wackos start rioting again for any reason related to her replacement. You thought Cavanaugh was bad. It’s going to be great. Get your popcorn ready
yep, their party has extreme left them.
people who vote for democrats need to stop and evaluate..
who are you?..moderate Trump or radical Antifa?
just like the "mostly peaceful" protestors, you are who you associate with.
Correct bc the Republicans were in charge of the Senate then. There have been 7 court vacancies filled during Presidential campaign years since 1900. In every case the President made the nomination promptly upon the vacancy, The case of confirmation also proceeded normally in these seven judges.
The case of delaying until after the election only materializes since 1992 under the so called Biden rule. The Biden rule addresses the case where a President of one party requires a confirmation vote by the senate controlled by the other party. This rule has been used only twice once in 1992 (Republican President - Democrat senate) and in 2016 (Democrat President- Republican Senate). This is not a case for the Biden rule as we have a Republican President AND a Republican Senate.
No hypocrisy. It’s just not what you would like.
Last edited:
You made all that up. Watch what republican senators said. Graham said to use his words against him - giving this exact scenario as his example.
Sorry bud! Those are all facts. Look it up.
I don’t care what Republican clips you have. Trump, like every President before him will nominate a replacement and the Senate, like every Senate in the past, will decide when to take up the nomination, In this case, the nomination will be taken up for debate and confirmed.
Probably. Though I bet Garland is wondering about the “when to take up the nomination” part.
If it costs Trump the election and Republicans the Senate, will it be worth it to you?
It won’t. But thank you for your concern.
That wasn’t the question.
And look at what her death did for contributions. What do you think will happen if a new justice is confirmed?
Ginsburg's death draws big surge of donations to Democrats
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats raised more than $71 million in the hours after Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, demonstrating how the liberal icon's passing and the contentious nomination fight that lies ahead have already galvanized the party's base.
apnews.com
That wasn’t the question.
And look at what her death did for contributions. What do you think will happen if a new justice is confirmed?
Ginsburg's death draws big surge of donations to Democrats
WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats raised more than $71 million in the hours after Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, demonstrating how the liberal icon's passing and the contentious nomination fight that lies ahead have already galvanized the party's base.
Contributing is not something I’m worried about
Obama nominated Garland, Trump has every right to nominate who he wants. Difference here is who controls teh Senate. If it was a Dem Senate for Garland's confirmation he would have been seated (I tend to believe if there was a Dem Senate the candidate would have been farther left leaning). Republican's hold the Senate and they can do as they please. I think it will be hard still to confirm because of the moderates that lack resolution.
And I applaud Ginsburg for her focus on equality, but she was one of the worst justices to ever sit on the bench. If she was so focused on equality and rights she should have been in Congress, writing laws. Her interpretation of them most always ignored the 10th amendment. Lots of far reaching that took the powers out of the states hands and in itself was Un-Constitutional. We were not created to have a controlling Federal government. We were for the most part to be 13 (now 50) individual governments. Some in agreement, some not. A lot of the issues we have today in disagreements is in turn because the Federal Government has dictated how to live lives. Federalism needs to be re-embraced.
And I applaud Ginsburg for her focus on equality, but she was one of the worst justices to ever sit on the bench. If she was so focused on equality and rights she should have been in Congress, writing laws. Her interpretation of them most always ignored the 10th amendment. Lots of far reaching that took the powers out of the states hands and in itself was Un-Constitutional. We were not created to have a controlling Federal government. We were for the most part to be 13 (now 50) individual governments. Some in agreement, some not. A lot of the issues we have today in disagreements is in turn because the Federal Government has dictated how to live lives. Federalism needs to be re-embraced.
