ADVERTISEMENT

For the Ags taking ivermectin as a Covid preventative:

Use it or don't but the idea that ivermectin has only ever been used as a de-wormer on horses, dogs, etc. is absurd. Ivermectin has been medically used in humans since 1981 after discovery/invention in 1975 and its antiviral properties have been widely known for those 46 years.

There are large-scale studies underway on its efficacy in humans vs. covid in RCT human trials. But the initial results are promising.

The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro

Abstract

Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans.

Ivermectin: an award-winning drug with expected antiviral activity against COVID-19

Abstract

Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges. Here, we discuss challenges surrounding the use of ivermectin in the context of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and how novel formulations employing micro- and nanotechnologies may address these concerns.

Antiviral effect of high-dose ivermectin in adults with COVID-19: A proof-of-concept randomized trial

Abstract

Background

There are limited antiviral options for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Ivermectin (IVM), a macrocyclic lactone with a wide anti-parasitary spectrum, has shown potent activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. This study aimed at assessing the antiviral effect of IVM on viral load of respiratory secretions and its relationship with drug concentrations in plasma.

Methods

Proof-of-concept, pilot, randomized, controlled, outcome-assessor blinded trial to evaluate antiviral activity of high-dose IVM in 45 COVID-19 hospitalized patients randomized in a 2:1 ratio to standard of care plus oral IVM at 0·6 mg/kg/day for 5 days versus standard of care in 4 hospitals in Argentina. Eligible patients were adults with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptoms onset. The primary endpoint was the difference in viral load in respiratory secretions between baseline and day-5, by quantitative RT-PCR. Concentrations of IVM in plasma were measured. Study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04381884.
Has your wife started calling you Wilber yet?

giphy.gif
 
Amazing what ppl are willing to put in their bodies that haven't been fully tested or FDA approved and has shown serious side effects including heart attacks and has no long term studies to check safety for children.

And to keep you shut up here's proof for both heart attacks (even on young kids): https://www.ibtimes.com/teen-suffer...ter-receiving-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-3275705

And in case you don't like that site, how about the CDC?
But but but….I like eating like shit, never exercising and just want a pill or shot that will make me think I’m invincible!
 
That's nothing compared to what 97's mom told me about him last night...once she caught her breath and all...
Well......to be fair to her.......she was already pretty worn out when left out the backdoor. We thought it was 97's dad! It was you huh?!? Shit, had I known it was you, I'd a waited and done a shift handover meeting and given you a fist bump.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Longneck 80
So if you were to take ivermectin as a preventative how often would you need to take it?
 
Which part? lol.... yea, Big tech is the worst. I'm not looking forward to the day when they give me an ultimatum
Got mine today. Hospital systems I’m in and out of are requiring it to access the hospital starting Nov 12 th. Sucks to be a Garbage Pail Kid by force. Have to make a living
 
  • Sad
Reactions: tdogdfw
So if you were to take ivermectin as a preventative how often would you need to take it?
I don’t know about humans but I give it to my dog the first of every month. It started getting hard to get at the feed store so I got 50cc from Amazon. I have been giving it to dogs for well over 30 years and it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wick
I guess I don't understand this controversy...isn't ivermectin's efficacy well established now? Is this just another political fight by proxy?

The worst I've heard about this therapy is the need to eliminate alcohol and caffeine use.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lukeag
I guess I don't understand this controversy...isn't ivermectin's efficacy well established now? Is this just another political fight by proxy?

The worst I've heard about this therapy is the need to eliminate alcohol and caffeine use.
Yes, this is true but any tool in a fight.
 
I guess I don't understand this controversy...isn't ivermectin's efficacy well established now? Is this just another political fight by proxy?

The worst I've heard about this therapy is the need to eliminate alcohol and caffeine use.not as a prophylactic or therapeutic for Covid
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocksolid
Amazing what ppl are willing to put in their bodies to avoid taking part in a free modern medicine miracle.
Typical midwit who has done no independent research and just blindly trusts MSNBC.

There's nothing wrong with either route but to act like there is no risk in a vaccine that's only under use due to EUA is idiotic. Several other companies abandoned mRNA research due to the toxicity of nanoparticle delivery.

There's actually probably less risk with Ivermectin but you do you.
 
You want to dose at .09x lb, per body weight. Fist dose followed my a second dose 3 days. One dose every other week. Ie 180lbs is 16mg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RepublicanAg
Typical midwit who has done no independent research and just blindly trusts MSNBC.

There's nothing wrong with either route but to act like there is no risk in a vaccine that's only under use due to EUA is idiotic. Several other companies abandoned mRNA research due to the toxicity of nanoparticle delivery.

There's actually probably less risk with Ivermectin but you do you.
Thank you for the information. Would you mind providing some links so that we can research what companies quit because of the risks and to see how you came to the conclusion that Ivermectin is less risky?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lonestarag05
So if you were to take ivermectin as a preventative how often would you need to take it?
If exposed Take initial dose followed by the second dose 3 days later. single dose every other week as a preventative. Dosing is per individual body weight using .09 as the calculator. Ie 180lbs x .09 is 16mg.
 
If exposed Take initial dose followed by the second dose 3 days later. single dose every other week as a preventative. Dosing is per individual body weight using .09 as the calculator. Ie 180lbs x .09 is 16mg.
So how/what dose would you use if you actually had COVID-19?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cwallyag
Thank you for the information. Would you mind providing some links so that we can research what companies quit because of the risks and to see how you came to the conclusion that Ivermectin is less risky?
How about you actually research it yourself troll, it's well documented that it was abandoned 25-30 years ago before they recently started working with it again.

Risk: one is fully FDA approved for human use, the other is not
 
Typical midwit who has done no independent research and just blindly trusts MSNBC.

There's nothing wrong with either route but to act like there is no risk in a vaccine that's only under use due to EUA is idiotic. Several other companies abandoned mRNA research due to the toxicity of nanoparticle delivery.

There's actually probably less risk with Ivermectin but you do you.
In the history of medicine, there's not been a more documented case of safety and efficacy of a vaccine than w/ the covid shots. There is more data supporting that these shots are safe than literally anything else we've ever done. They are a miracle. Your silly response above is reflective of an unserious person that has pudding for a brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rudy06 and Tom_100
In the history of medicine, there's not been a more documented case of safety and efficacy of a vaccine than w/ the covid shots. There is more data supporting that these shots are safe than literally anything else we've ever done. They are a miracle. Your silly response above is reflective of an unserious person that has pudding for a brain.
"There is more data than literally anything else we've ever done" profoundly stupid, untrue, and impossible considering it's been out for less than a year so it is impossible to know what the possible long term effects are OR repeated exposure through frequent boosters. Pudding for a brain would be projection evidenced by the fact that you are completely unable to consider alternatives which is typical of a midwit.

I look at facts on my own but I don't consider someone like Bret Weinstein to be unserious or uneducated on the matter and he's more in line with my opinion than yours.

Board was better without your smug dipshittery which is quite ironic given how often you're wrong.
 
"There is more data than literally anything else we've ever done" profoundly stupid, untrue, and impossible considering it's been out for less than a year so it is impossible to know what the possible long term effects are OR repeated exposure through frequent boosters. Pudding for a brain would be projection evidenced by the fact that you are completely unable to consider alternatives which is typical of a midwit.

I look at facts on my own but I don't consider someone like Bret Weinstein to be unserious or uneducated on the matter and he's more in line with my opinion than yours.

Board was better without your smug dipshittery which is quite ironic given how often you're wrong.
Sorry you are q-pilled and want to take horse dick meds instead. "facts" lol. I passed mortuary trucks in town today b/c many like you and those here on this thread chose to "do their own research" rather than get a safe/free miracle of modern medicine. They are here b/c many more US citizens are going to die, many begging for the vaccine as they sit on a ventilator, needlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgNok
Sorry you are q-pilled and want to take horse dick meds instead. "facts" lol. I passed mortuary trucks in town today b/c many like you and those here on this thread chose to "do their own research" rather than get a safe/free miracle of modern medicine. They are here b/c many more US citizens are going to die, many begging for the vaccine as they sit on a ventilator, needlessly.
I don't take it. It's not horse dick meds you twit.

I'm not saying anybody shouldn't get it and I think a lot of people should get it, just that you're an idiot for being unable to consider that might be some risk associated with the vaccine. It probably is fine but to say with certainty that there is no risk is the mark of a fool.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT