Having taken business management classes at TAMU in areas of union labor relations/law, etc. while I was waiting for some research equipment to be repaired......and the fact we live in a right to work state where state employees are not allowed to formally unionize, what are the implications for college sports, and in Texas in particular??
It seems the lawsuit that opened up the possibility of NIL has also resulted in discussions as to whether players should be considered employees of the university, and as such, would be able to form unions.
I know of one state that has actually been encouraging that discussion although with one group tried to get college player unions started a couple of years ago, it flopped with little or no interest by college players. The NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA, etc. are the corporations that the player unions deal directly. The teams are part of a franchise type system that must adhere to the organization and any labor agreements. There is no similar national organization that falls under this category. The NCAA has volunteer members and has no contractual agreements this would fall under.
One the one hand, if players are considered employees, there are lots of national and state regulations that must be followed. That alone could be overwhelming as to how to do this. I think scholarships would have to be revamped into a new contractual agreement (based upon the state laws). HR would become a major player and headache. Benefits provided players vs. regular students would become benefits and taxable. Would players have to pay for some insurance since regular students are not provided this. etc. etc. etc.
Players in California, New York, etc. would find support to organize in unions but who would they engage. In Texas, state employees are not allowed to organize. There are state unions but they can only advocate and provide some services. They have no authority to negotiate contracts. However, there are companies in Texas that must deal with unions because of their contracts with the federal government or military. Lockheed is one. Airlines are another. The petrochemical plants are unionized as is the automotive plant in Fort Worth. I spend time running my father's heavy construction shop and dealing with the unions when the company worked on the docks or plants in CC. That was a mess bound by insane rules that increased costs at job sites significantly.
Nick Saban says he is not afraid of players organizing or players becoming employees. He also says he "can’t honestly say that I’m qualified to know exactly what the cause and effect of that would really be". Truth is he has no idea how this would impact his program, his recruiting, his ability to deal with player issues, etc.
Is there a real chance players become employees? what would that entail, and what impact would that have on the university and athletics?
Would players actually unionize in other states, and how would this play out in Texas?
IF I remember right, professional players have to pay a tax in some cities when they play there under the rationale that since they earned income in that state and city, they owe some type of income tax. How would that play out?
You can see I am a little bored today with the heat, mugginess (2 inches of rain last night wiping out the drone show (no fireworks anymore) last night, and limited options to go do something today.