The dog ate my homework. You gotta believe me!
- Thread starter bioaggie
- Start date
I would have to hear the full segment to get a full understanding but for now I am astonished with this along with you bioaggie. Did someone not think to make a copy? Did anyone think to scan them in and email them to the left coast? Pretty silly if you ask me.
But looking at the situation, is it the deep state at it again protecting the lying, cheating democrats? What other plausible possibilities are out there?
But looking at the situation, is it the deep state at it again protecting the lying, cheating democrats? What other plausible possibilities are out there?
Nah they trusted their entire case to a bunch of $15/hr strangers handling their evidence.
Yea that’s ridiculous, however I imagine Bobulinski has plenty of this backed up to protect himself and his family.
Interesting you referring to anything “deep state” as plausible.
Bc that’s a bat shit crazy conspiracy theory. Crazier than a pet raccoon.
What is the hunter Biden dossier?
Here’s what we know: Joe leveraged his elected VP position for personal financial gain
Here’s what we know: Joe leveraged his elected VP position for personal financial gain
Did...did you just use a silly sitcom from the 60s as evidence that a pet raccoon isn’t crazy?
yes, except for the computer, emails, and former business partner very publicly distancing himself from the "russian disinformation" claim, we have nothing.
...despite the feverish efforts of cnn and nbc to pursue the story or invalidate the claims of the russian agent former naval officer.
Guys, you don’t understand. Alex Jones is filling you full of shit.
You need to be listening to what the New York times tells you.
Y’all will believe this no matter what. Blind guy working on computers from people living thousands of miles away who happens to be buddies with the presidents personal idiot lawyer and the computer owners dont ever go retrieve their computers... yeah, all sounds about right. And all published in a tabloid owned by Rupert Murdock.
But whatever. You believe it so you guys can all stroke each other off in your outrage.
But whatever. You believe it so you guys can all stroke each other off in your outrage.
Let me guess, you’re about to clam the fvck up and go play in some other thread like when the NYT was proven factually incorrect in the losers/suckers discussion?
Who knows. Maybe Rudy got played again like Sacha Baron Cohen played him. He’s not a particularly difficult target and intel said he would be targeted.
Business partner in the deal (with high-level govt security clearance) turning over information. Both publicly and to the FBI.
. Biden used that factually incorrect statement in his NFL football add tonight
Just got tired of dealing with you dumb asses. I stand by what I said about NYT. They don’t purposefully publish false info.
No it’s not. You asked if it’s a right wing conspiracy and I said I don’t know. Maybe. Or maybe it’s just Rudy getting punked. It’s a direct response to your question.
Six FBI agents quiz Tony Bobulinski for hours
Former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski says he met with agents at FBI headquarters for about five hours to discuss his allegations about a China business deal.
Except laying the groundwork for the structure and scope of Biden’s international business dealings
A guy said he was interviewed by the FBI. That’s your proof something happened?Six FBI agents quiz Tony Bobulinski for hours
Former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski says he met with agents at FBI headquarters for about five hours to discuss his allegations about a China business deal.www.google.com
Can we have an intelligent conversation?
Perhaps you’d like to provide documentation?
It seems that you’re leading up to trying to make the case that anything reported by the news can never be believed because the possibility not only exists—but is likely—that the information is a complete fabrication. Am I getting close?
Last edited:
What’s funny is I said I didn’t believe or care about the losers suckers story bc it was from anonymous sources. But as usual, facts aren’t really your cup of tea.
But I guess I’m a stupid ass bc you can’t remember what I said so you make whatever you want up. Seems like your brand to make up what others argue, then knock those straw men down. May need to ease up on the bourbon bud.
One quote from that thread from me...
“I said from the very beginning of this story that any story based on anonymous sources isn’t worth paying attention to. I think if your going to make these kind of accusations you have to let Trump challenge the accusers.”
Last edited:
