In terms of financial investment - his 85 million is a sunk cost - we pay it no matter what - like if you bought a sinking ship for 85 million- it’s spent and done and really irrelevant except for replacement cost - if you buy a rent house and it burns down without insurance , it no longer factors into the decision to buy a new rent house- only factor is if you have the money - would BMA be willing to buy another ship ( aka coach) and spend the bucks to get a really good one - or do we just say screw football for the next 4 years and compete with Vandy
Jimbo contract is a sunk cost from investment standpoint
- Thread starter agdoc716
- Start date
