ADVERTISEMENT

HCQ update: hypocritical vs Hippocratic

2th_doc

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 18, 2008
24,709
7,448
113
austin
physicians vow to do what is best for their patients, but Hippocrates wasn't informed about the FDA.

the absurd opposition by influencers within the medical community to widespread use of HCQ for early treatment of Covid-19 will one day be revealed as entirely political, or if not political then polluted with bias of some nature.

FDA shenanigans

EVERY study which has concluded that HCQ is either ineffective or dangerous has studied hospitalized patients (or prophylaxis).

EVERY study that focuses on early treatment concludes that HCQ has demonstrable positive effect in reducing death, hospitalization rate, and morbidity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dad_in_tx and wick
We have to expect a colder weather wave of any and all viral respiratory diseases, so expect media emphasis on cases and hospitalizations.

The crime here is that a safe, easy, and inexpensive titratable therapy is right in our hands, however FDA, AMA, DNC and DocLiberato all insist it’s ineffective and even “potentially” harmful or dangerous.

For those unsubstantiated reasons, we are at their mercy, and must allow grandma to sit lonely in a hospital room and watch grandpa die as a result of Covid robbing him of ability to breathe, even after desperate nurses shove a ventilator down his trachea..
then grandma weeps over him, composes herself, walks to the elevator, down to the lobby to let the rest of the family know her life has been shattered.. and grandpa’s life has been ignored by our medical heroes.
 
Iowa has prohibited the administering of HCQ - crazy shit.
 
Iowa has prohibited the administering of HCQ - crazy shit.
link?.. i see nothing of the sort,
instead yet another "study" saying HCQ is ineffective in severe/ hospitalized cases..
so damn dumn..
it's akin to waiting a few hours after a stroke to administer aspirin.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT